NEws and Media

A tougher judgment preservation market does not mean cover has disappeared, but it does mean plaintiffs need to approach insurers with a stronger, more disciplined appellate story. This blog looks at what recent reversals mean for post-verdict insurance, and what still makes a damages judgment attractive to the market.

We are delighted to share that TheJudge has once again been ranked Band 1 by Chambers & Partners for Litigation Insurance Brokers. This marks our seventh consecutive year ranked Band 1 — a milestone we are very proud of, and one we do not take for granted.

Most discussions of litigation insurance focus on risk transfer. But for many corporate claimants, litigation insurance is increasingly serving a different purpose: helping boards and management teams make better capital allocation decisions around valuable legal assets.

When comparing ATE policies, the headline premium is only part of the story. The way a premium is structured, particularly where litigation funding is also involved, can have a significant impact on the client's ultimate recovery and the overall economics of a claim.

The team at TheJudge Global is delighted to have joined the The Association of Litigation Funders of Australia as an associate member.

Before deciding between upfront and contingent premiums, it’s worth comparing the true economics of each structure. The “cheapest” option on paper is often not the most cost-effective in practice, Robert Warner explains.

Security for costs applications remain a familiar risk for claimants—and a key area where funders and insurers often step in. A recent England & Wales case highlights that, beyond having coverage, the timing and sequencing of security arrangements can have significant cost implications.

The UPC Court of Appeal in Syntorr v Arthrex held that properly structured ATE insurance with an anti‑avoidance endorsement (AAE) can fully satisfy the claimant’s “financial position” under Art. 69(4) UPCA / Rule 158.1 RoP, removing the need for costly security for costs deposits or guarantees. Robert Warner of TheJudge, who helped structure the insurance, highlighted that the decision preserves access to justice for capital‑constrained claimants while providing a court‑credible, cost‑effective alternative to traditional cash or bank‑guarantee security.

This past year marked a significant milestone for TheJudge Group: 25 years dedicated exclusively to litigation risk insurance. As we close that year and step into our 26th, it’s a moment to pause and reflect on what a quarter century in this specialised market has taught us.

TheJudge’ Robert Warner shares some insights into what the next generation of lawyers in the UK need to know about litigation funding and insurance.

As economic pressure, procedural reform and political scrutiny continue to shape the UK litigation landscape, 2026 is set to be a defining year for both litigation insurance and third-party funding. These are the trends we predict for 2026. . .

We’re proud to share that TheJudge has once again been ranked Band 1 by Chambers & Partners, marking our sixth consecutive year at the top of the rankings.

After-the-event (ATE) insurance policies fortified with anti-avoidance endorsements (AAEs) have increasingly been offered as security for costs in litigation.

In a landmark decision, the English High Court has, for the first time, ordered security for costs in a challenge to a proposed restructuring plan.

We are immensely proud to be recognised by our clients for our expert knowledge, strong industry relationships, and the responsiveness of our team. We are particularly honoured to have received a top rank from Chambers in the Litigation Support category for a fifth consecutive year.